<div dir="ltr"><div>You are correct Roy. This issue in my mind is closed. We can dub around for hours, days and months on stuff that we should not even spend seconds on.</div><div><br></div><div>Again, this issue is closed,</div><div><br></div><div>Glenn</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Roy Briscoe <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:roysail@hotmail.com" target="_blank">roysail@hotmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Ahh the life and times at PYC. Over the years The Flags should write all these snippets down and put them in a binder to hand off to the next set of Flag officers. So over the years it could be quite a set humorous anecdotes <br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
> On Jun 15, 2018, at 3:58 PM, Glenn Michael <<a href="mailto:glennwmichael@gmail.com">glennwmichael@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> Did I miss something? The mooring was advertised as a max of 40 feet. The people win the lottery and decline it because they want a boat longer than 40 feet.<br>
> <br>
> Then, my interpretation of loose talk starts, and all of a sudden people "believe" that it can hold greater than 40 feet, so now they want the mooring.<br>
> <br>
> I want somebody to tell me what I just wrote is what happened in this scenario. The mooring was PUBLISHED at a max of 40 feet. After that, I really do not care what transpired.<br>
> <br>
> Glenn<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>