From wsmith5125 at comcast.net Sat Apr 20 19:10:00 2019 From: wsmith5125 at comcast.net (wsmith5125 at comcast.net) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 21:10:00 -0400 Subject: [Board] House and Dock Rules In-Reply-To: References: <2091969936.2051913.1555700291218.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <2091969936.2051913.1555700291218@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <000001d4f7de$f249a4e0$d6dceea0$@comcast.net> From: Board On Behalf Of Glenn Michael Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 8:43 PM To: Board of Directors Subject: Re: [Board] House and Dock Rules Thank you sir. This issue merits a discussion. I appreciate everyone's input, and at the end of the day, we do not have to do anything. See you all tomorrow, Glenn On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:59 PM Arthur Dionne > wrote: To All, I believe that Glenn made the suggestion in order to get the issue on our May Agenda. It is on the May Agenda and we will work out the details at our Meeting Regards, Art -----Original Message----- From: Glenn Michael > To: Board of Directors > Sent: Fri, Apr 19, 2019 2:44 pm Subject: Re: [Board] House and Dock Rules To All, Remember, the way the amendment is written, the member may get a slip not owning a boat and then put it in. The only real difference is the time parameter to do it. G On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:37 PM Jeremy Small > wrote: I am in the same "Boat" as Scott. I don't see the problem with a Member waiting to get a slip to then buy a boat. My family actually did this exact thing, waited until we got a slip and then purchased the boat that would fit in the slip. Jeremy On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:33 PM Glenn Michael > wrote: Hi Scott, Good points as always. The crux of this is that people want to select a slip not owning a boat, and they have over a year to put one in it. It was felt that members with a boat ready to use it is more appropriate. Trust me, we can do nothing and leave it as is. The request was for some wording to possibly tighten up the present policy. Thanks for the response, Glenn On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:13 PM Scott Blidberg > wrote: Hi all, apologies as I missed the last meeting and haven’t seen the minutes yet so am not aware of all discussion points relating to this item. For my awareness, Is there something specific driving this change? What issue is this looking to solve? Regarding what is outlined in the document.. as Glenn alluded to, I’d feel that July 1st is very aggressive to consider a slip “vacant”. As much as many would like nothing more than to have their boats in as early as possible, there are unfortunately times when life doesn’t permit a boat taking priority. As someone with a new young child and a job that goes through spurts of very heavy workloads and/or travel requirements I worry about adding to that a hard deadline at the beginning of the summer before I would lose a slip. Additionally, how, for example, does this take into account major work that may need to be done on a boat? Please let me know if there were pertinent areas of discussion during the meeting that may assist in addressing my thoughts above! -Scott On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:23 PM Glenn Michael > wrote: Good Afternoon, Attached is a DRAFT amendment to the H&D Rules concerning slips. At the last meeting it was felt that the section concerning slip occupancy should be amended to adjust slip occupancy requirements. This draft may be too harsh, but it reflects a direction that the BOD wanted to go. Please provide input if you wish, and I can change as necessary. Thanks, Glenn -- Scott Blidberg scott.blidberg at gmail.com Phone: 603.674.1179 http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottblidberg -- Jeremy Small 603.661.7371 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: