From glennwmichael at gmail.com Fri Apr 19 09:58:52 2019 From: glennwmichael at gmail.com (Glenn Michael) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Board] Pay Bands Message-ID: Good Morning, At our last meeting the subject of our current employee pay bands was brought up and the feeling was that we needed to be more competitive in the tight job market. Attached is a revised pay band document for the approval of the BOD. Since Wes and Freida need to firm up some of the employees, we should strive to approve this soon. The figures are competitive with comparable positions within our area. We want to be competitive and get good employees, but at the same time, not break the bank. This is NOT in concrete, so feel free to recommend further adjustments. I will leave it up to the Flag Officers to determine how to get BOD approval......email, next meeting, etc. Thanks, Glenn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2019 Pay Bands PORTSMOUTH YACHT CLUB.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 10719 bytes Desc: not available URL: From adjd at aol.com Fri Apr 19 10:10:18 2019 From: adjd at aol.com (Arthur Dionne) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 16:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Board] Pay Bands References: <1852425960.1986531.1555690218349.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1852425960.1986531.1555690218349@mail.yahoo.com> Good Afternoon, Thanks for your input Glenn. The BOD will take this up at our next Meeting. I do not believe that we need to be concerned with this season's pay rates. I believe that Frieda has already been able to secure Staff for this season. Regards,Art -----Original Message----- From: Glenn Michael To: Board of Directors Sent: Fri, Apr 19, 2019 11:59 am Subject: [Board] Pay Bands Good Morning, At our last meeting the subject of our current employee pay bands was brought up and the feeling was that we needed to be more competitive in the tight job market. Attached is a revised pay band document for the approval of the BOD. Since Wes and Freida need to firm up some of the employees, we should strive to approve this soon. The figures are competitive with comparable positions within our area. We want to be competitive and get good employees, but at the same time, not break the bank. This is NOT in concrete, so feel free to recommend further adjustments. I will leave it up to the Flag Officers to determine how to get BOD approval......email, next meeting, etc. Thanks, Glenn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From glennwmichael at gmail.com Fri Apr 19 10:15:15 2019 From: glennwmichael at gmail.com (Glenn Michael) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Board] Pay Bands In-Reply-To: <1852425960.1986531.1555690218349@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1852425960.1986531.1555690218349.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1852425960.1986531.1555690218349@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Thank you Sir, Fine with me if we are good with this years pay!! G On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:11 PM Arthur Dionne wrote: > Good Afternoon, > Thanks for your input Glenn. > The BOD will take this up at our next Meeting. > I do not believe that we need to be concerned with this season's pay > rates. I believe that Frieda has already been able to secure Staff for this > season. > Regards, > Art > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Glenn Michael > To: Board of Directors > Sent: Fri, Apr 19, 2019 11:59 am > Subject: [Board] Pay Bands > > Good Morning, > > At our last meeting the subject of our current employee pay bands was > brought up and the feeling was that we needed to be more competitive in the > tight job market. > > Attached is a revised pay band document for the approval of the BOD. > Since Wes and Freida need to firm up some of the employees, we should > strive to approve this soon. The figures are competitive with comparable > positions within our area. We want to be competitive and get good > employees, but at the same time, not break the bank. This is NOT in > concrete, so feel free to recommend further adjustments. > > I will leave it up to the Flag Officers to determine how to get BOD > approval......email, next meeting, etc. > > Thanks, > > Glenn > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From glennwmichael at gmail.com Fri Apr 19 10:22:42 2019 From: glennwmichael at gmail.com (Glenn Michael) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Board] House and Dock Rules Message-ID: Good Afternoon, Attached is a DRAFT amendment to the H&D Rules concerning slips. At the last meeting it was felt that the section concerning slip occupancy should be amended to adjust slip occupancy requirements. This draft may be too harsh, but it reflects a direction that the BOD wanted to go. Please provide input if you wish, and I can change as necessary. Thanks, Glenn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PYC House and Dock 2019 Amendment DRAFT.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 10280 bytes Desc: not available URL: From scott.blidberg at gmail.com Fri Apr 19 12:13:31 2019 From: scott.blidberg at gmail.com (Scott Blidberg) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Board] House and Dock Rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, apologies as I missed the last meeting and haven’t seen the minutes yet so am not aware of all discussion points relating to this item. For my awareness, Is there something specific driving this change? What issue is this looking to solve? Regarding what is outlined in the document.. as Glenn alluded to, I’d feel that July 1st is very aggressive to consider a slip “vacant”. As much as many would like nothing more than to have their boats in as early as possible, there are unfortunately times when life doesn’t permit a boat taking priority. As someone with a new young child and a job that goes through spurts of very heavy workloads and/or travel requirements I worry about adding to that a hard deadline at the beginning of the summer before I would lose a slip. Additionally, how, for example, does this take into account major work that may need to be done on a boat? Please let me know if there were pertinent areas of discussion during the meeting that may assist in addressing my thoughts above! -Scott On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:23 PM Glenn Michael wrote: > Good Afternoon, > > Attached is a DRAFT amendment to the H&D Rules concerning slips. At the > last meeting it was felt that the section concerning slip occupancy should > be amended to adjust slip occupancy requirements. > > This draft may be too harsh, but it reflects a direction that the BOD > wanted to go. Please provide input if you wish, and I can change as > necessary. > > Thanks, > > Glenn > -- Scott Blidberg scott.blidberg at gmail.com Phone: 603.674.1179 http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottblidberg -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From glennwmichael at gmail.com Fri Apr 19 12:32:48 2019 From: glennwmichael at gmail.com (Glenn Michael) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Board] House and Dock Rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Scott, Good points as always. The crux of this is that people want to select a slip not owning a boat, and they have over a year to put one in it. It was felt that members with a boat ready to use it is more appropriate. Trust me, we can do nothing and leave it as is. The request was for some wording to possibly tighten up the present policy. Thanks for the response, Glenn On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:13 PM Scott Blidberg wrote: > Hi all, apologies as I missed the last meeting and haven’t seen the > minutes yet so am not aware of all discussion points relating to this item. > > For my awareness, Is there something specific driving this change? What > issue is this looking to solve? > > Regarding what is outlined in the document.. as Glenn alluded to, I’d feel > that July 1st is very aggressive to consider a slip “vacant”. As much as > many would like nothing more than to have their boats in as early as > possible, there are unfortunately times when life doesn’t permit a boat > taking priority. > > As someone with a new young child and a job that goes through spurts of > very heavy workloads and/or travel requirements I worry about adding to > that a hard deadline at the beginning of the summer before I would lose a > slip. > > Additionally, how, for example, does this take into account major work > that may need to be done on a boat? > > Please let me know if there were pertinent areas of discussion during the > meeting that may assist in addressing my thoughts above! > > -Scott > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:23 PM Glenn Michael > wrote: > >> Good Afternoon, >> >> Attached is a DRAFT amendment to the H&D Rules concerning slips. At the >> last meeting it was felt that the section concerning slip occupancy should >> be amended to adjust slip occupancy requirements. >> >> This draft may be too harsh, but it reflects a direction that the BOD >> wanted to go. Please provide input if you wish, and I can change as >> necessary. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Glenn >> > -- > Scott Blidberg > > scott.blidberg at gmail.com > Phone: 603.674.1179 > http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottblidberg > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jsmall.105 at gmail.com Fri Apr 19 12:37:00 2019 From: jsmall.105 at gmail.com (Jeremy Small) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:37:00 -0400 Subject: [Board] House and Dock Rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I am in the same "Boat" as Scott. I don't see the problem with a Member waiting to get a slip to then buy a boat. My family actually did this exact thing, waited until we got a slip and then purchased the boat that would fit in the slip. Jeremy On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:33 PM Glenn Michael wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Good points as always. > > The crux of this is that people want to select a slip not owning a boat, > and they have over a year to put one in it. It was felt that members with > a boat ready to use it is more appropriate. Trust me, we can do nothing > and leave it as is. The request was for some wording to possibly tighten > up the present policy. > > Thanks for the response, > > Glenn > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:13 PM Scott Blidberg > wrote: > >> Hi all, apologies as I missed the last meeting and haven’t seen the >> minutes yet so am not aware of all discussion points relating to this item. >> >> For my awareness, Is there something specific driving this change? What >> issue is this looking to solve? >> >> Regarding what is outlined in the document.. as Glenn alluded to, I’d >> feel that July 1st is very aggressive to consider a slip “vacant”. As much >> as many would like nothing more than to have their boats in as early as >> possible, there are unfortunately times when life doesn’t permit a boat >> taking priority. >> >> As someone with a new young child and a job that goes through spurts of >> very heavy workloads and/or travel requirements I worry about adding to >> that a hard deadline at the beginning of the summer before I would lose a >> slip. >> >> Additionally, how, for example, does this take into account major work >> that may need to be done on a boat? >> >> Please let me know if there were pertinent areas of discussion during the >> meeting that may assist in addressing my thoughts above! >> >> -Scott >> >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:23 PM Glenn Michael >> wrote: >> >>> Good Afternoon, >>> >>> Attached is a DRAFT amendment to the H&D Rules concerning slips. At the >>> last meeting it was felt that the section concerning slip occupancy should >>> be amended to adjust slip occupancy requirements. >>> >>> This draft may be too harsh, but it reflects a direction that the BOD >>> wanted to go. Please provide input if you wish, and I can change as >>> necessary. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Glenn >>> >> -- >> Scott Blidberg >> >> scott.blidberg at gmail.com >> Phone: 603.674.1179 >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottblidberg >> > -- Jeremy Small 603.661.7371 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From glennwmichael at gmail.com Fri Apr 19 12:44:20 2019 From: glennwmichael at gmail.com (Glenn Michael) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:44:20 -0400 Subject: [Board] House and Dock Rules In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: To All, Remember, the way the amendment is written, the member may get a slip not owning a boat and then put it in. The only real difference is the time parameter to do it. G On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:37 PM Jeremy Small wrote: > I am in the same "Boat" as Scott. I don't see the problem with a Member > waiting to get a slip to then buy a boat. My family actually did this > exact thing, waited until we got a slip and then purchased the boat that > would fit in the slip. > > Jeremy > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:33 PM Glenn Michael > wrote: > >> Hi Scott, >> >> Good points as always. >> >> The crux of this is that people want to select a slip not owning a boat, >> and they have over a year to put one in it. It was felt that members with >> a boat ready to use it is more appropriate. Trust me, we can do nothing >> and leave it as is. The request was for some wording to possibly tighten >> up the present policy. >> >> Thanks for the response, >> >> Glenn >> >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:13 PM Scott Blidberg >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, apologies as I missed the last meeting and haven’t seen the >>> minutes yet so am not aware of all discussion points relating to this item. >>> >>> For my awareness, Is there something specific driving this change? What >>> issue is this looking to solve? >>> >>> Regarding what is outlined in the document.. as Glenn alluded to, I’d >>> feel that July 1st is very aggressive to consider a slip “vacant”. As much >>> as many would like nothing more than to have their boats in as early as >>> possible, there are unfortunately times when life doesn’t permit a boat >>> taking priority. >>> >>> As someone with a new young child and a job that goes through spurts of >>> very heavy workloads and/or travel requirements I worry about adding to >>> that a hard deadline at the beginning of the summer before I would lose a >>> slip. >>> >>> Additionally, how, for example, does this take into account major work >>> that may need to be done on a boat? >>> >>> Please let me know if there were pertinent areas of discussion during >>> the meeting that may assist in addressing my thoughts above! >>> >>> -Scott >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:23 PM Glenn Michael >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Good Afternoon, >>>> >>>> Attached is a DRAFT amendment to the H&D Rules concerning slips. At >>>> the last meeting it was felt that the section concerning slip occupancy >>>> should be amended to adjust slip occupancy requirements. >>>> >>>> This draft may be too harsh, but it reflects a direction that the BOD >>>> wanted to go. Please provide input if you wish, and I can change as >>>> necessary. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Glenn >>>> >>> -- >>> Scott Blidberg >>> >>> scott.blidberg at gmail.com >>> Phone: 603.674.1179 >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottblidberg >>> >> > > -- > Jeremy Small > 603.661.7371 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From adjd at aol.com Fri Apr 19 12:58:11 2019 From: adjd at aol.com (Arthur Dionne) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Board] House and Dock Rules References: <2091969936.2051913.1555700291218.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2091969936.2051913.1555700291218@mail.yahoo.com> To All, I believe that Glenn made the suggestion in order to get the issue on our May Agenda. It is on the May Agenda and we will work out the details at our MeetingRegards,Art -----Original Message----- From: Glenn Michael To: Board of Directors Sent: Fri, Apr 19, 2019 2:44 pm Subject: Re: [Board] House and Dock Rules To All, Remember, the way the amendment is written, the member may get a slip not owning a boat and then put it in. The only real difference is the time parameter to do it. G On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:37 PM Jeremy Small wrote: I am in the same "Boat" as Scott. I don't see the problem with a Member waiting to get a slip to then buy a boat. My family actually did this exact thing, waited until we got a slip and then purchased the boat that would fit in the slip. Jeremy On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:33 PM Glenn Michael wrote: Hi Scott, Good points as always. The crux of this is that people want to select a slip not owning a boat, and they have over a year to put one in it. It was felt that members with a boat ready to use it is more appropriate. Trust me, we can do nothing and leave it as is. The request was for some wording to possibly tighten up the present policy. Thanks for the response, Glenn On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:13 PM Scott Blidberg wrote: Hi all, apologies as I missed the last meeting and haven’t seen the minutes yet so am not aware of all discussion points relating to this item. For my awareness, Is there something specific driving this change? What issue is this looking to solve? Regarding what is outlined in the document.. as Glenn alluded to, I’d feel that July 1st is very aggressive to consider a slip “vacant”. As much as many would like nothing more than to have their boats in as early as possible, there are unfortunately times when life doesn’t permit a boat taking priority. As someone with a new young child and a job that goes through spurts of very heavy workloads and/or travel requirements I worry about adding to that a hard deadline at the beginning of the summer before I would lose a slip. Additionally, how, for example, does this take into account major work that may need to be done on a boat? Please let me know if there were pertinent areas of discussion during the meeting that may assist in addressing my thoughts above! -Scott On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:23 PM Glenn Michael wrote: Good Afternoon, Attached is a DRAFT amendment to the H&D Rules concerning slips. At the last meeting it was felt that the section concerning slip occupancy should be amended to adjust slip occupancy requirements. This draft may be too harsh, but it reflects a direction that the BOD wanted to go. Please provide input if you wish, and I can change as necessary. Thanks, Glenn -- Scott Blidberg scott.blidberg at gmail.com Phone: 603.674.1179 http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottblidberg -- Jeremy Small 603.661.7371 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From glennwmichael at gmail.com Fri Apr 19 18:42:43 2019 From: glennwmichael at gmail.com (Glenn Michael) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 20:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Board] House and Dock Rules In-Reply-To: <2091969936.2051913.1555700291218@mail.yahoo.com> References: <2091969936.2051913.1555700291218.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <2091969936.2051913.1555700291218@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Thank you sir. This issue merits a discussion. I appreciate everyone's input, and at the end of the day, we do not have to do anything. See you all tomorrow, Glenn On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:59 PM Arthur Dionne wrote: > To All, > I believe that Glenn made the suggestion in order to get the issue on > our May Agenda. It is on the May Agenda and we will work out the details at > our Meeting > Regards, > Art > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Glenn Michael > To: Board of Directors > Sent: Fri, Apr 19, 2019 2:44 pm > Subject: Re: [Board] House and Dock Rules > > To All, > > Remember, the way the amendment is written, the member may get a slip not > owning a boat and then put it in. The only real difference is the time > parameter to do it. > > G > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:37 PM Jeremy Small wrote: > > I am in the same "Boat" as Scott. I don't see the problem with a Member > waiting to get a slip to then buy a boat. My family actually did this > exact thing, waited until we got a slip and then purchased the boat that > would fit in the slip. > > Jeremy > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:33 PM Glenn Michael > wrote: > > Hi Scott, > > Good points as always. > > The crux of this is that people want to select a slip not owning a boat, > and they have over a year to put one in it. It was felt that members with > a boat ready to use it is more appropriate. Trust me, we can do nothing > and leave it as is. The request was for some wording to possibly tighten > up the present policy. > > Thanks for the response, > > Glenn > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:13 PM Scott Blidberg > wrote: > > Hi all, apologies as I missed the last meeting and haven’t seen the > minutes yet so am not aware of all discussion points relating to this item. > > For my awareness, Is there something specific driving this change? What > issue is this looking to solve? > > Regarding what is outlined in the document.. as Glenn alluded to, I’d feel > that July 1st is very aggressive to consider a slip “vacant”. As much as > many would like nothing more than to have their boats in as early as > possible, there are unfortunately times when life doesn’t permit a boat > taking priority. > > As someone with a new young child and a job that goes through spurts of > very heavy workloads and/or travel requirements I worry about adding to > that a hard deadline at the beginning of the summer before I would lose a > slip. > > Additionally, how, for example, does this take into account major work > that may need to be done on a boat? > > Please let me know if there were pertinent areas of discussion during the > meeting that may assist in addressing my thoughts above! > > -Scott > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:23 PM Glenn Michael > wrote: > > Good Afternoon, > > Attached is a DRAFT amendment to the H&D Rules concerning slips. At the > last meeting it was felt that the section concerning slip occupancy should > be amended to adjust slip occupancy requirements. > > This draft may be too harsh, but it reflects a direction that the BOD > wanted to go. Please provide input if you wish, and I can change as > necessary. > > Thanks, > > Glenn > > -- > Scott Blidberg > > scott.blidberg at gmail.com > Phone: 603.674.1179 > http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottblidberg > > > > -- > Jeremy Small > 603.661.7371 > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: