From scott.blidberg at gmail.com  Thu Jul 19 07:16:47 2018
From: scott.blidberg at gmail.com (Scott Blidberg)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 09:16:47 -0400
Subject: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide
In-Reply-To: <00ad01d41edb$020eea30$062cbe90$@comcast.net>
References: <164ae0bb297-c94-d990@webjas-vaa046.srv.aolmail.net>
	<04db01d41eae$e542a580$afc7f080$@comcast.net>
	<9963D8CD-9559-4869-80C0-D321EA2F9799@comcast.net>
	<00ad01d41edb$020eea30$062cbe90$@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <CADgzbB_F_G=10w65Rw6x3p7UGeAL7j9O7UMaXYtbgwbyS482zQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi All, a few of my thoughts after following the discussion so far..

   - Obviously, if we can solve this at minimal cost (and within current
   permits) it is worth at least exploring options!
   - Removing floats on the dinghy docks seems somewhat counter-intuitive
   (particularly when it would come at an expense/loss), particularly with the
   amount of conversation recently on how congested the dinghy area has been
   and how we may need to limit the number of dinghys moving forward..
   - I do feel it's important to keep in mind that there will always be
   times when the tides will dictate if/when some can use their boat.  In my
   last slip, for example, there were certain tides that I couldn't get the
   boat out and around the corner, so I just knew that for that 30 min - 1
   hour window I just wasn't going out. I feel the pain of folks that may want
   to get out but can't due to tides, but scheduling accordingly is in some
   ways part of of the price of doing business on the river.

I'm in agreement in that I think actually looking at the permit sounds like
the next critical step here, as until we know what would be in scope we are
flying blind a bit.

-Scott

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:05 PM Dan Gingras <dgingras at comcast.net> wrote:

> I think so.   We should look at the permit as Art Suggests, but I think if
> they used an excavator to remove the rocks, and it’s within the scope of
> the permit, we could kill two birds with one stone.
>
>
>
> *From:* Board <board-bounces at portsmouthyc.org> *On Behalf Of *Wesley Smith
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 18, 2018 12:26 PM
> *To:* Board of Directors <board at portsmouthyc.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> I have Pickering coming over today or tomorrow to look at replacing a
> pilling under the pier. Should we talk to them about removing some of the
> rocks?
>
>
>
> Wes
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Jul 18, 2018, at 11:49 AM, Dan Gingras <dgingras at comcast.net> wrote:
>
> Art,
>
>
>
>     We have a permit to remove the rocks, do you think that could be
> accomplished with an excavator and  “sort of” dredge at the same time.
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Board <board-bounces at portsmouthyc.org> *On Behalf Of *Arthur
> Dionne
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 18, 2018 11:39 AM
> *To:* roysail at hotmail.com; board at portsmouthyc.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide
>
>
>
> Roy,
>
> It appears that you think that removing both Dock #18 and Dock #19 will
> solve the problem. I disagree! The only way to actually solve the problem
> is to dredge the area around the dinghy docks. In order to do that we will
> have to fight for permission to do the dredging and that will take time and
> will not be easy or inexpensive.
>
> As for your point regarding selling both docks, while there is probably
> people that would buy them I am sure that we would have to take a
> significant financial loss. With regard to adding Dock #18 to the end of
>  finger Dock #26, it would raise two issues, (1) it would make its very
> difficult to enter and exit the Slips at the inner end of the face docks
> and (2) no doubt require the installation of an additional piling at the
> end of Dock #18 art a cost of at least  $1500 and we would still have to
> sell Dock #19.
>
> There are no easy answers!
>
> Arft
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roy Briscoe <roysail at hotmail.com>
> To: Arthur Dionne <adjd at aol.com>; Board of Directors <
> board at portsmouthyc.org>
> Sent: Tue, Jul 17, 2018 10:09 pm
> Subject: Re: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide
>
> Yep that time line is accurate from what I recall. The unfortunate and
> unforeseen problem is the extension dock, #18, attached past the piling now
> puts any dinghy attached to #18 on the rocks at low tide and it blocks any
> dinghy tied up closer the pier from getting out.
>
>
>
> I've attached some pictures from a "normal" low tide. You can see that the
> dinghies attached to the #16 & #17 are floating at low tide, but the ones
> attached to #18 are high and dry. Note the "Hover Craft" photo.
>
>
>
> We could sell #18 & #19 to a PYC member or Craigslist it. Or move #18 to
> the end of #26 and have 2 spots for the launches, but it might make getting
> out of the face dock slips a bit tight, but it might be OK. And I think we
> would still need to move some rocks but maybe a lot less of them so they
> can get around the piling.
>
>
>
> Not sure what the answer(s) is.
>
>
>
> Roy
>
>
>
> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Board <board-bounces at portsmouthyc.org> on behalf of Arthur Dionne
> <adjd at aol.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 17, 2018 6:25 PM
> *To:* board at portsmouthyc.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide
>
>
>
> Greetings,
>
>             As far as I am aware, the small dinghy dock (Dock #19) was
> purchased and installed in 2016 at a cost of about $4500. At the time that
> it was installed, it was attached to the end of Dock #17 which is where the
> longer Dock #18 is now attached. Prior to the present configuration, Dock
> #18 was positioned in the spot where Dock #19 is presently positioned. The
> reason for the change in the positions of Dock #18 and Dock #19 was in
> effort to provide the most space for dinghys on the land side of the dinghy
> dock area. Obviously, if Dock #18 was in place where Dock #19 is now
> located it would extend further towards land than Dock #19 does now.
>
>             We have had the problem of the dinghys grounding for a fairly
> long time and it appears the problem has gotten worse in spite of our
> efforts as the configuration of the river bottom surrounding the dinghy
> area has changed as more material (rocks and sand) has decreased the
> average depthof the dinghy area at low and high tide.
>
>             From my point of view, removing Dock #19 will not appreciable
> help the situation. If it is decided to remove Dock #19, we will have to
> (1) store Dock #19 in our parking area or (2) sell Dock #19. Storing Dock
> #19 will result in losing a parking space in the parking lot and selling
> Dock #19 will most likely result in a financial loss. Whatever option we
> choose will not appreciable solve the dinghy grounding problem.
>
> Regards,
>
> Art
>
> P.S. Sketch of the configuration of PYC’s docks is attached.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roy Briscoe <roysail at hotmail.com>
> To: Board of Directors <board at portsmouthyc.org>
> Sent: Mon, Jul 16, 2018 9:00 pm
> Subject: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide
>
> Here are some pictures of the dinghy dock at low tide this past weekend.
> The tides this weekend were more extreme than usual, but you can see the
> issue with that last dinghy dock and the rocks. Any you can see how the
> small "T" extension also causes issues with pushing the dinghies even
> closer to shore and further into the mud.
>
>
>
> There are 10 dinghies there and 7 under the pier. So there is plenty of
> room to tie up the dinghies even if we removed the short extension, which
> is really just in the way, and the last dock after the pilling.
>
>
>
> Roy
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from Outlook
> <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fweboutlook&data=02%7C01%7C%7C06b797338b0c4bd0247008d5ec12d873%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636674488621190386&sdata=oDmFpMipcYVRqgeOs2ugcROrwzX%2B3Jso8jpZrMv4MaA%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Scott Blidberg

scott.blidberg at gmail.com
Phone:  603.674.1179
http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottblidberg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://portsmouthyc.org/pipermail/board_portsmouthyc.org/attachments/20180719/37b7e7df/attachment.htm>

From roysail at hotmail.com  Thu Jul 19 08:16:07 2018
From: roysail at hotmail.com (Roy Briscoe)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:16:07 +0000
Subject: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide
In-Reply-To: <CADgzbB_F_G=10w65Rw6x3p7UGeAL7j9O7UMaXYtbgwbyS482zQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <164ae0bb297-c94-d990@webjas-vaa046.srv.aolmail.net>
	<04db01d41eae$e542a580$afc7f080$@comcast.net>
	<9963D8CD-9559-4869-80C0-D321EA2F9799@comcast.net>
	<00ad01d41edb$020eea30$062cbe90$@comcast.net>,
	<CADgzbB_F_G=10w65Rw6x3p7UGeAL7j9O7UMaXYtbgwbyS482zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BN6PR1701MB1730C9380E2D62D0C128AB0DBC520@BN6PR1701MB1730.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>

Let me clarify any rumors that the dinghy dock is congested, it is not!

There are only 10 dinghies on docks on the road side with about 70' of face dock to tie them up to. There are 7 dinghies tied up under the pier, so we have a grand total of 17 dinghies signed up this year. Hardly crowded and in need of limiting how many we have though a limit of 30 for the future might be a good number.

If we can move an area of about 20 feet by 35 feet of rocks that are in front of the last dock, that would be great. Otherwise if we remove the last dock then that removes the impediment for the dinghies to get out from behind the other docks for most low tides.  And the dinghies tied to the last dock won't be getting damaged because they are bouncing on rocks for 3-4 hours a day. And if we remove dock 19, that makes room for another dinghy or two and removes another impediment for dinghies to get around at low tide.


Roy


Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>

________________________________
From: Board <board-bounces at portsmouthyc.org> on behalf of Scott Blidberg <scott.blidberg at gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 1:16 PM
To: Board of Directors
Subject: Re: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide

Hi All, a few of my thoughts after following the discussion so far..

  *   Obviously, if we can solve this at minimal cost (and within current permits) it is worth at least exploring options!
  *   Removing floats on the dinghy docks seems somewhat counter-intuitive (particularly when it would come at an expense/loss), particularly with the amount of conversation recently on how congested the dinghy area has been and how we may need to limit the number of dinghys moving forward..
  *   I do feel it's important to keep in mind that there will always be times when the tides will dictate if/when some can use their boat.  In my last slip, for example, there were certain tides that I couldn't get the boat out and around the corner, so I just knew that for that 30 min - 1 hour window I just wasn't going out. I feel the pain of folks that may want to get out but can't due to tides, but scheduling accordingly is in some ways part of of the price of doing business on the river.

I'm in agreement in that I think actually looking at the permit sounds like the next critical step here, as until we know what would be in scope we are flying blind a bit.

-Scott

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:05 PM Dan Gingras <dgingras at comcast.net<mailto:dgingras at comcast.net>> wrote:

I think so.   We should look at the permit as Art Suggests, but I think if they used an excavator to remove the rocks, and it’s within the scope of the permit, we could kill two birds with one stone.



From: Board <board-bounces at portsmouthyc.org<mailto:board-bounces at portsmouthyc.org>> On Behalf Of Wesley Smith
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 12:26 PM
To: Board of Directors <board at portsmouthyc.org<mailto:board at portsmouthyc.org>>
Subject: Re: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide



Dan



I have Pickering coming over today or tomorrow to look at replacing a pilling under the pier. Should we talk to them about removing some of the rocks?



Wes

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 18, 2018, at 11:49 AM, Dan Gingras <dgingras at comcast.net<mailto:dgingras at comcast.net>> wrote:

Art,



    We have a permit to remove the rocks, do you think that could be accomplished with an excavator and  “sort of” dredge at the same time.



Dan







From: Board <board-bounces at portsmouthyc.org<mailto:board-bounces at portsmouthyc.org>> On Behalf Of Arthur Dionne
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 11:39 AM
To: roysail at hotmail.com<mailto:roysail at hotmail.com>; board at portsmouthyc.org<mailto:board at portsmouthyc.org>
Subject: Re: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide



Roy,

It appears that you think that removing both Dock #18 and Dock #19 will solve the problem. I disagree! The only way to actually solve the problem is to dredge the area around the dinghy docks. In order to do that we will have to fight for permission to do the dredging and that will take time and will not be easy or inexpensive.

As for your point regarding selling both docks, while there is probably people that would buy them I am sure that we would have to take a significant financial loss. With regard to adding Dock #18 to the end of  finger Dock #26, it would raise two issues, (1) it would make its very difficult to enter and exit the Slips at the inner end of the face docks and (2) no doubt require the installation of an additional piling at the end of Dock #18 art a cost of at least  $1500 and we would still have to sell Dock #19.

There are no easy answers!

Arft



-----Original Message-----
From: Roy Briscoe <roysail at hotmail.com<mailto:roysail at hotmail.com>>
To: Arthur Dionne <adjd at aol.com<mailto:adjd at aol.com>>; Board of Directors <board at portsmouthyc.org<mailto:board at portsmouthyc.org>>
Sent: Tue, Jul 17, 2018 10:09 pm
Subject: Re: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide

Yep that time line is accurate from what I recall. The unfortunate and unforeseen problem is the extension dock, #18, attached past the piling now puts any dinghy attached to #18 on the rocks at low tide and it blocks any dinghy tied up closer the pier from getting out.



I've attached some pictures from a "normal" low tide. You can see that the dinghies attached to the #16 & #17 are floating at low tide, but the ones attached to #18 are high and dry. Note the "Hover Craft" photo.



We could sell #18 & #19 to a PYC member or Craigslist it. Or move #18 to the end of #26 and have 2 spots for the launches, but it might make getting out of the face dock slips a bit tight, but it might be OK. And I think we would still need to move some rocks but maybe a lot less of them so they can get around the piling.



Not sure what the answer(s) is.



Roy



Sent from Outlook<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fweboutlook&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd7d9c8b10dc24d9a538f08d5ed79f8eb%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636676030473987850&sdata=QaE%2BTQGhklYcX6vgMO%2B6qrjQFzntNd32itU6hn%2FVUbM%3D&reserved=0>

________________________________

From: Board <board-bounces at portsmouthyc.org<mailto:bounces at portsmouthyc.org>> on behalf of Arthur Dionne <adjd at aol.com<mailto:adjd at aol.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 6:25 PM
To: board at portsmouthyc.org<mailto:board at portsmouthyc.org>
Subject: Re: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide



Greetings,

            As far as I am aware, the small dinghy dock (Dock #19) was purchased and installed in 2016 at a cost of about $4500. At the time that it was installed, it was attached to the end of Dock #17 which is where the longer Dock #18 is now attached. Prior to the present configuration, Dock #18 was positioned in the spot where Dock #19 is presently positioned. The reason for the change in the positions of Dock #18 and Dock #19 was in effort to provide the most space for dinghys on the land side of the dinghy dock area. Obviously, if Dock #18 was in place where Dock #19 is now located it would extend further towards land than Dock #19 does now.

            We have had the problem of the dinghys grounding for a fairly long time and it appears the problem has gotten worse in spite of our efforts as the configuration of the river bottom surrounding the dinghy area has changed as more material (rocks and sand) has decreased the average depthof the dinghy area at low and high tide.

            From my point of view, removing Dock #19 will not appreciable help the situation. If it is decided to remove Dock #19, we will have to (1) store Dock #19 in our parking area or (2) sell Dock #19. Storing Dock #19 will result in losing a parking space in the parking lot and selling Dock #19 will most likely result in a financial loss. Whatever option we choose will not appreciable solve the dinghy grounding problem.

Regards,

Art

P.S. Sketch of the configuration of PYC’s docks is attached.



-----Original Message-----
From: Roy Briscoe <roysail at hotmail.com<mailto:roysail at hotmail.com>>
To: Board of Directors <board at portsmouthyc.org<mailto:board at portsmouthyc.org>>
Sent: Mon, Jul 16, 2018 9:00 pm
Subject: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide

Here are some pictures of the dinghy dock at low tide this past weekend. The tides this weekend were more extreme than usual, but you can see the issue with that last dinghy dock and the rocks. Any you can see how the small "T" extension also causes issues with pushing the dinghies even closer to shore and further into the mud.



There are 10 dinghies there and 7 under the pier. So there is plenty of room to tie up the dinghies even if we removed the short extension, which is really just in the way, and the last dock after the pilling.



Roy





Sent from Outlook<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fweboutlook&data=02%7C01%7C%7C06b797338b0c4bd0247008d5ec12d873%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636674488621190386&sdata=oDmFpMipcYVRqgeOs2ugcROrwzX%2B3Jso8jpZrMv4MaA%3D&reserved=0>






--
Scott Blidberg

scott.blidberg at gmail.com<mailto:scott.blidberg at gmail.com>
Phone:  603.674.1179
http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottblidberg<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fscottblidberg&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd7d9c8b10dc24d9a538f08d5ed79f8eb%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636676030473987850&sdata=hZmSJfo4HQaONqV0CpdjqF5PesZJYqsF3CCSgpG1Btw%3D&reserved=0>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://portsmouthyc.org/pipermail/board_portsmouthyc.org/attachments/20180719/05d3bf84/attachment.htm>

From adjd at aol.com  Thu Jul 19 10:01:31 2018
From: adjd at aol.com (Arthur Dionne)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:01:31 -0400
Subject: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR1701MB1730C9380E2D62D0C128AB0DBC520@BN6PR1701MB1730.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <164b34661a5-c97-11d9e@webjas-vaa108.srv.aolmail.net>


Greetings,
Thanks to Wes Smith and Mike Coffey, I have reviewed a copy of the Wetlands Permit. The Permit was amended and approved on May 20, 2016. As amended and approved, PYC was granted the following:
“1) The removal by handof eight (8) rocks near the dinghy dock that are being struck by the dinghies at low tide and relocate them to the stone revetment along the shoreline.” (emphasis added)
In view of the above language, the Permit does not permit dredging the area around the dinghy docks. As removal of the 8 rocks could, at least partially, remedy the low tide dinghy grounding problem we should remove the 8 rocks this year as the Permit expires on February 21, 2019.
Regards,
Art



-----Original Message-----
From: Roy Briscoe <roysail at hotmail.com>
To: Scott Blidberg <scott.blidberg at gmail.com>; Board of Directors <board at portsmouthyc.org>
Sent: Thu, Jul 19, 2018 10:16 am
Subject: Re: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide



Let me clarify any rumors that the dinghy dock is congested, it is not! 


There are only 10 dinghies on docks on the road side with about 70' of face dock to tie them up to. There are 7 dinghies tied up under the pier, so we have a grand total of 17 dinghies signed up this year. Hardly crowded and in need of limiting how many we have though a limit of 30 for the future might be a good number. 


If we can move an area of about 20 feet by 35 feet of rocks that are in front of the last dock, that would be great. Otherwise if we remove the last dock then that removes the impediment for the dinghies to get out from behind the other docks for most low tides.  And the dinghies tied to the last dock won't be getting damaged because they are bouncing on rocks for 3-4 hours a day. And if we remove dock 19, that makes room for another dinghy or two and removes another impediment for dinghies to get around at low tide.
 



Roy



Sent from Outlook


From: Board <board-bounces at portsmouthyc.org> on behalf of Scott Blidberg <scott.blidberg at gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 1:16 PM
To: Board of Directors
Subject: Re: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide
 

Hi All, a few of my thoughts after following the discussion so far..

Obviously, if we can solve this at minimal cost (and within current permits) it is worth at least exploring options!  

Removing floats on the dinghy docks seems somewhat counter-intuitive (particularly when it would come at an expense/loss), particularly with the amount of conversation recently on how congested the dinghy area has been and how we may need to limit the number of dinghys moving forward..

I do feel it's important to keep in mind that there will always be times when the tides will dictate if/when some can use their boat.  In my last slip, for example, there were certain tides that I couldn't get the boat out and around the corner, so I just knew that for that 30 min - 1 hour window I just wasn't going out. I feel the pain of folks that may want to get out but can't due to tides, but scheduling accordingly is in some ways part of of the price of doing business on the river.  


I'm in agreement in that I think actually looking at the permit sounds like the next critical step here, as until we know what would be in scope we are flying blind a bit.


-Scott



On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:05 PM Dan Gingras <dgingras at comcast.net> wrote:



I think so.   We should look at the permit as Art Suggests, but I think if they used an excavator to remove the rocks, and it’s within the scope of the permit, we could kill two birds with one stone.  
 

From: Board <board-bounces at portsmouthyc.org>On Behalf Of Wesley Smith
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 12:26 PM
To: Board of Directors <board at portsmouthyc.org>
Subject: Re: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide

 

Dan

 

I have Pickering coming over today or tomorrow to look at replacing a pilling under the pier. Should we talk to them about removing some of the rocks?

 

Wes

Sent from my iPhone


On Jul 18, 2018, at 11:49 AM, Dan Gingras <dgingras at comcast.net> wrote:


Art,
 
    We have a permit to remove the rocks, do you think that could be accomplished with an excavator and  “sort of” dredge at the same time.
 
Dan
 
 
 
From: Board <board-bounces at portsmouthyc.org>On Behalf Of Arthur Dionne
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 11:39 AM
To: roysail at hotmail.com;board at portsmouthyc.org
Subject: Re: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide
 

Roy,

It appears that you think that removing both Dock #18 and Dock #19 will solve the problem. I disagree! The only way to actually solve the problem is to dredge the area around the dinghy docks. In order to do that we will have to fight for permission to do the dredging and that will take time and will not be easy or inexpensive.

As for your point regarding selling both docks, while there is probably people that would buy them I am sure that we would have to take a significant financial loss. With regard to adding Dock #18 to the end of  finger Dock #26, it would raise two issues, (1) it would make its very difficult to enter and exit the Slips at the inner end of the face docks and (2) no doubt require the installation of an additional piling at the end of Dock #18 art a cost of at least  $1500 and we would still have to sell Dock #19.

There are no easy answers!

Arft  




-----Original Message-----
From: Roy Briscoe <roysail at hotmail.com>
To: Arthur Dionne <adjd at aol.com>; Board of Directors <board at portsmouthyc.org>
Sent: Tue, Jul 17, 2018 10:09 pm
Subject: Re: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide


Yep that time line is accurate from what I recall. The unfortunate and unforeseen problem is the extension dock, #18, attached past the piling now puts any dinghy attached to #18 on the rocks at low tide and it blocks any dinghy tied up closer the pier from getting out.

 

I've attached some pictures from a "normal" low tide. You can see that the dinghies attached to the #16 & #17 are floating at low tide, but the ones attached to #18 are high and dry. Note the "Hover Craft" photo.

 

We could sell #18 & #19 to a PYC member or Craigslist it. Or move #18 to the end of #26 and have 2 spots for the launches, but it might make getting out of the face dock slips a bit tight, but it might be OK. And I think we would still need to move some rocks but maybe a lot less of them so they can get around the piling.

 

Not sure what the answer(s) is.

 

Roy

 


Sent fromOutlook




From: Board <board-bounces at portsmouthyc.org> on behalf of Arthur Dionne <adjd at aol.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 6:25 PM
To: board at portsmouthyc.org
Subject: Re: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide

 


Greetings,

            As far as I am aware, the small dinghy dock (Dock #19) was purchased and installed in 2016 at a cost of about $4500. At the time that it was installed, it was attached to the end of Dock #17 which is where the longer Dock #18 is now attached. Prior to the present configuration, Dock #18 was positioned in the spot where Dock #19 is presently positioned. The reason for the change in the positions of Dock #18 and Dock #19 was in effort to provide the most space for dinghys on the land side of the dinghy dock area. Obviously, if Dock #18 was in place where Dock #19 is now located it would extend further towards land than Dock #19 does now.

            We have had the problem of the dinghys grounding for a fairly long time and it appears the problem has gotten worse in spite of our efforts as the configuration of the river bottom surrounding the dinghy area has changed as more material (rocks and sand) has decreased the average depthof the dinghy area at low and high tide.

            From my point of view, removing Dock #19 will not appreciable help the situation. If it is decided to remove Dock #19, we will have to (1) store Dock #19 in our parking area or (2) sell Dock #19. Storing Dock #19 will result in losing a parking space in the parking lot and selling Dock #19 will most likely result in a financial loss. Whatever option we choose will not appreciable solve the dinghy grounding problem.

Regards,

Art

P.S. Sketch of the configuration of PYC’s docks is attached.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Roy Briscoe <roysail at hotmail.com>
To: Board of Directors <board at portsmouthyc.org>
Sent: Mon, Jul 16, 2018 9:00 pm
Subject: [Board-2018] Dinghy Dock at an low tide


Here are some pictures of the dinghy dock at low tide this past weekend. The tides this weekend were more extreme than usual, but you can see the issue with that last dinghy dock and the rocks. Any you can see how the small "T" extension also causes issues with pushing the dinghies even closer to shore and further into the mud.

 

There are 10 dinghies there and 7 under the pier. So there is plenty of room to tie up the dinghies even if we removed the short extension, which is really just in the way, and the last dock after the pilling. 

 

Roy

 

 


Sent fromOutlook


 


 








-- 

Scott Blidberg

scott.blidberg at gmail.com
Phone:  603.674.1179
http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottblidberg



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://portsmouthyc.org/pipermail/board_portsmouthyc.org/attachments/20180719/583b2bfb/attachment.htm>

From glennwmichael at gmail.com  Thu Jul 19 18:08:22 2018
From: glennwmichael at gmail.com (Glenn Michael)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 20:08:22 -0400
Subject: [Board-2018] Constitutional changes
Message-ID: <CAC7tJWZCJq8T=KbJxy5cRejreFPfsZWeasgProCxiYgzp+T5KA@mail.gmail.com>

Good Evening,

I met with Joe Nadeau concerning our proposed changes to the application
fees and dues.

He has asked that we share this (assuming we approve of his wording) with
the members as a DRAFT prior to publishing them for the meeting.  We have
the entire month of August to get any input.  His feeling is that if we put
this out at the meeting (keeping in mind very few will read the official
notice prior),it will help keep any discussion on point and not prolong the
meeting.  The choice is up to the BOD, so please let me know.

We can ask for ages on the application, and attached is the suggested
wording of our amendments.

I have met with town concerning the fence...further news to follow.

Thanks for everything that you all do for the club.

Glenn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://portsmouthyc.org/pipermail/board_portsmouthyc.org/attachments/20180719/64c5718e/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Amend ARTICLE XII  7-19-18.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 23552 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://portsmouthyc.org/pipermail/board_portsmouthyc.org/attachments/20180719/64c5718e/attachment.doc>

From info at blueberrybayfarm.com  Thu Jul 19 18:19:54 2018
From: info at blueberrybayfarm.com (Ron Laurence - Blueberry Bay Farm)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 20:19:54 -0400
Subject: [Board-2018] Constitutional changes
In-Reply-To: <CAC7tJWZCJq8T=KbJxy5cRejreFPfsZWeasgProCxiYgzp+T5KA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC7tJWZCJq8T=KbJxy5cRejreFPfsZWeasgProCxiYgzp+T5KA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <cab34aca-51e5-a358-e900-dc18e7beddec@blueberrybayfarm.com>

On 7/19/2018 8:08 PM, Glenn Michael wrote:
> Good Evening,
>
> I met with Joe Nadeau concerning our proposed changes to the 
> application fees and dues.
>
> He has asked that we share this (assuming we approve of his wording) 
> with the members as a DRAFT prior to publishing them for the meeting.  
> We have the entire month of August to get any input.  His feeling is 
> that if we put this out at the meeting (keeping in mind very few will 
> read the official notice prior),it will help keep any discussion on 
> point and not prolong the meeting.  The choice is up to the BOD, so 
> please let me know.
>
> We can ask for ages on the application, and attached is the suggested 
> wording of our amendments.
>
> I have met with town concerning the fence...further news to follow.
>
> Thanks for everything that you all do for the club.
>
> Glenn


-- 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://portsmouthyc.org/pipermail/board_portsmouthyc.org/attachments/20180719/08a1b820/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Auto signature copy.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 133438 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://portsmouthyc.org/pipermail/board_portsmouthyc.org/attachments/20180719/08a1b820/attachment.jpg>