[Board] Vote on nominated people for Board and Membership committee

[Jim McAdams]

I agree with letting all candidates, previously vetted, run. The only time the number of candidates should equal the number of positions is when there are not enough members interested in or qualified to hold the open positions. 

Jim




On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:11 PM -0400, "Dick Blidberg" <blidberg at ausi.org> wrote:










I do agree we should let all of the people that have been posted to run 
for the various offices.  Let the membership decide who they wish to 
have fill the positions.


On 9/27/2016 5:37 PM, Nancy Gulley wrote:
> It has been called to my attention by Dave Wajda that we did not 
> vote on the names presented by the nominating committee for the Board 
> or Membership committee and that there is a feeling by some that we 
> have put too many people up for nomination and not specifically 
> selected 4 for the Board and 2 for Membership.  To the point of the 
> number...there is nothing in the Constitution that states we only 
> specify the ones we feel should be on the Board or Membership.  
> So my feeling and that of others is we have offered up a great slate 
> of potential Board and Membership potentials.
>
> Please let me know if you have an concerns and please state your vote 
> for the nominated people.
>
> Carole, I will talk to you tomorrow.
>
> Again, I believe we did a great job in Encouraging new participants.
>
> Nanc


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus







-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://portsmouthyc.org/pipermail/board_portsmouthyc.org/attachments/20160928/be1e55e2/attachment.htm>