From blidberg at ausi.org  Wed Sep 28 10:44:14 2016
From: blidberg at ausi.org (Dick Blidberg)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:44:14 -0400
Subject: [Board] Vote on nominated people for Board and Membership
 committee
In-Reply-To: <CAEYcus8=Y7+F-r=A-gEXdigaCb+FSDtO+pxmtOr=12TCCoS11g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEYcus8=Y7+F-r=A-gEXdigaCb+FSDtO+pxmtOr=12TCCoS11g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <a201a1d7-8d9c-fa41-ab96-4456a7ca4f8f@ausi.org>

I do agree we should let all of the people that have been posted to run 
for the various offices.  Let the membership decide who they wish to 
have fill the positions.


On 9/27/2016 5:37 PM, Nancy Gulley wrote:
> It has been called to my attention by Dave Wajda that we did not 
> vote on the names presented by the nominating committee for the Board 
> or Membership committee and that there is a feeling by some that we 
> have put too many people up for nomination and not specifically 
> selected 4 for the Board and 2 for Membership.  To the point of the 
> number...there is nothing in the Constitution that states we only 
> specify the ones we feel should be on the Board or Membership.  
> So my feeling and that of others is we have offered up a great slate 
> of potential Board and Membership potentials.
>
> Please let me know if you have an concerns and please state your vote 
> for the nominated people.
>
> Carole, I will talk to you tomorrow.
>
> Again, I believe we did a great job in Encouraging new participants.
>
> Nanc


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



From jamcadams at comcast.net  Wed Sep 28 15:03:32 2016
From: jamcadams at comcast.net (Jim McAdams)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 21:03:32 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [Board] Vote on nominated people for Board and Membership
 committee
In-Reply-To: <a201a1d7-8d9c-fa41-ab96-4456a7ca4f8f@ausi.org>
References: <CAEYcus8=Y7+F-r=A-gEXdigaCb+FSDtO+pxmtOr=12TCCoS11g@mail.gmail.com>
	<a201a1d7-8d9c-fa41-ab96-4456a7ca4f8f@ausi.org>
Message-ID: <F40ABA1A206349C2.ECF78169-73D3-4C9A-9FD2-0404A6BA4BC0@mail.outlook.com>

I agree with letting all candidates, previously vetted, run. The only time the number of candidates should equal the number of positions is when there are not enough members interested in or qualified to hold the open positions. 

Jim




On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:11 PM -0400, "Dick Blidberg" <blidberg at ausi.org> wrote:










I do agree we should let all of the people that have been posted to run 
for the various offices.  Let the membership decide who they wish to 
have fill the positions.


On 9/27/2016 5:37 PM, Nancy Gulley wrote:
> It has been called to my attention by Dave Wajda that we did not 
> vote on the names presented by the nominating committee for the Board 
> or Membership committee and that there is a feeling by some that we 
> have put too many people up for nomination and not specifically 
> selected 4 for the Board and 2 for Membership.  To the point of the 
> number...there is nothing in the Constitution that states we only 
> specify the ones we feel should be on the Board or Membership.  
> So my feeling and that of others is we have offered up a great slate 
> of potential Board and Membership potentials.
>
> Please let me know if you have an concerns and please state your vote 
> for the nominated people.
>
> Carole, I will talk to you tomorrow.
>
> Again, I believe we did a great job in Encouraging new participants.
>
> Nanc


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus







-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://portsmouthyc.org/pipermail/board_portsmouthyc.org/attachments/20160928/be1e55e2/attachment.htm>

From roysail at hotmail.com  Wed Sep 28 15:12:02 2016
From: roysail at hotmail.com (Roy Briscoe)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 21:12:02 +0000
Subject: [Board] Vote on nominated people for Board and Membership
 committee
In-Reply-To: <F40ABA1A206349C2.ECF78169-73D3-4C9A-9FD2-0404A6BA4BC0@mail.outlook.com>
References: <CAEYcus8=Y7+F-r=A-gEXdigaCb+FSDtO+pxmtOr=12TCCoS11g@mail.gmail.com>
	<a201a1d7-8d9c-fa41-ab96-4456a7ca4f8f@ausi.org>,
	<F40ABA1A206349C2.ECF78169-73D3-4C9A-9FD2-0404A6BA4BC0@mail.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <BN6PR17MB153864E96BCDE6629BAE0F25BCCF0@BN6PR17MB1538.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>

Ditto for me. Let them all run and see who the membership votes in.


Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>


________________________________
From: Board <board-bounces at portsmouthyc.org> on behalf of Jim McAdams <jamcadams at comcast.net>
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 9:03 PM
To: Board of Directors
Subject: Re: [Board] Vote on nominated people for Board and Membership committee

I agree with letting all candidates, previously vetted, run. The only time the number of candidates should equal the number of positions is when there are not enough members interested in or qualified to hold the open positions.

Jim




On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:11 PM -0400, "Dick Blidberg" <blidberg at ausi.org<mailto:blidberg at ausi.org>> wrote:


I do agree we should let all of the people that have been posted to run
for the various offices.  Let the membership decide who they wish to
have fill the positions.


On 9/27/2016 5:37 PM, Nancy Gulley wrote:
> It has been called to my attention by Dave Wajda that we did not
> vote on the names presented by the nominating committee for the Board
> or Membership committee and that there is a feeling by some that we
> have put too many people up for nomination and not specifically
> selected 4 for the Board and 2 for Membership.  To the point of the
> number...there is nothing in the Constitution that states we only
> specify the ones we feel should be on the Board or Membership.
> So my feeling and that of others is we have offered up a great slate
> of potential Board and Membership potentials.
>
> Please let me know if you have an concerns and please state your vote
> for the nominated people.
>
> Carole, I will talk to you tomorrow.
>
> Again, I believe we did a great job in Encouraging new participants.
>
> Nanc


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://portsmouthyc.org/pipermail/board_portsmouthyc.org/attachments/20160928/3ecd1fa5/attachment.htm>

From wendyclement10 at comcast.net  Wed Sep 28 18:22:46 2016
From: wendyclement10 at comcast.net (Wendy)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 17:22:46 -0700
Subject: [Board] Vote on nominated people for Board and Membership
 committee
In-Reply-To: <CAEYcus8=Y7+F-r=A-gEXdigaCb+FSDtO+pxmtOr=12TCCoS11g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEYcus8=Y7+F-r=A-gEXdigaCb+FSDtO+pxmtOr=12TCCoS11g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <402C42C3-7EAC-41DC-9E69-ADD5D2A85273@comcast.net>

I agree to let them all run.  It is most fair and the membership makes the decision.

Regards,
Wendy Clement



> On Sep 27, 2016, at 2:37 PM, Nancy Gulley <nancgulley at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> It has been called to my attention by Dave Wajda that we did not vote on the names presented by the nominating committee for the Board or Membership committee and that there is a feeling by some that we have put too many people up for nomination and not specifically selected 4 for the Board and 2 for Membership.  To the point of the number...there is nothing in the Constitution that states we only specify the ones we feel should be on the Board or Membership.  So my feeling and that of others is we have offered up a great slate of potential Board and Membership potentials.
> 
> Please let me know if you have an concerns and please state your vote for the nominated people.
> 
> Carole, I will talk to you tomorrow.
> 
> Again, I believe we did a great job in Encouraging new participants.
> 
> Nanc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://portsmouthyc.org/pipermail/board_portsmouthyc.org/attachments/20160928/bf1b3e5a/attachment.htm>