[Board] Fwd: PYC Communictions
Wendy
wendyclement10 at comcast.net
Sat Sep 10 14:59:27 MDT 2016
I agree with Jim..... very thoughtful points. I also agree that this is not a constitution item and to be discussed in November.
Regards,
Wendy Clement
> On Sep 9, 2016, at 9:55 PM, Nancy Gulley <nancgulley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well as I am reading my emails top to bottom I see a mistake. Please read this from Carole.
> I actually thought Carole was not going to talk to Chris until we at least agreed on time of offer and pay schedule. I guess I was once again wrong! Now we have a new snake pit!
> Nanc
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: <cccartnick at comcast.net>
> Date: Friday, September 9, 2016
> Subject: PYC Communictions
> To: "Gulley, Nancy" <nancy at gulley.com>
>
>
> Hi Nancy -
>
> Looks like we have another bad situation to work on.
>
> I just talked with Chris Weller and told her the decision
> from last night about the Communications position.
>
> Chris is VERY disappointed and I would say VERY upset.
> She believes that the Board either doesn't understand the
> position or doesn't care. Here's why.
>
> 1. She spends about the same amount of hours that Doyle
> and I do on club work. She thinks that the Board does
> realize all that is involved with web site management,
> emails, and newsletters. She feels that she should be
> compensated the same as the Treasurer and Secretary.
> with her dues forgiven and an additional stipend.($1500).
>
> 2. She feels that her responsibilities should be recognized
> in the Constitution the same as the Treasurer and
> Secretary positions are. Times have changed, and the
> need for this specialized work has increased dramatically.
>
> 3. Yes, there is a description of a "Communications
> Committee" in the Member Directory. The write-up is not
> up to date. Also, other people listed on the committee have
> not done anything towards the communications functions in
> the past few years other than to manage cameras. etc.,
> which is now a totally different function from communications
> through the web site and emails. She feels, and I agree,
> that the Communications Committee mentioned on page 71
> of the directory should be removed, since it has not changed
> in many years.
>
> 4. Chris is certain that Board members are not aware of
> how much work is involved and how much it has impacted.
> the club. I can remember when attendance was slim and
> very dull at events. In the past 6 years, Chris'
> communications have increased interest and have also
> successfully advertised events either mistakenly listed or
> not listed in the annual schedule.
>
> 5. She feels this is a slap in the face because the position is
> not recognized properly. For example, the responsibility
> for newsletters is indicated in the Constitution as a
> responsibility of the Vice Commodore. Yet Chris has
> taken this responsibility on herself for years.
>
> Nancy, I've worked very closely with Chris for years, and saw
> her assume these responsibilities and do all this work 6 years
> ago because she saw the need. I have done all I can to bring
> this to the Board. I am not a Board member. Nor did they ask
> Chris to come before the Board to state her case. But I have
> seen her faithful and consistent work for the benefit of the club
> and can only worry about her taking this personally since no
> once seems to go to bat for her.
>
> I don't know what happens next but an wondering whether the
> Board could reconsider their position very very quickly.
>
> Best,
> Carole
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://portsmouthyc.org/pipermail/board_portsmouthyc.org/attachments/20160910/5d16b1cc/attachment.htm>
More information about the Board
mailing list