From nancgulley at gmail.com Tue Jul 26 05:07:02 2016 From: nancgulley at gmail.com (Nancy Gulley) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 07:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Board] Reinstatement options poll, reformatted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I go with Jim' comments except I think 5 years for reinstatement is more than enough and I really like every 5 th family for for reinstatement makes good sense also as we have some members who have been #1 up to 3 times and lost out over and over. Nanc On Tuesday, July 19, 2016, Roy Briscoe wrote: > I've reformatted the potential list of options and left a spot on each for > other ideas. We have Ron's response, so if the others could reply with > this email and mark the options you like, by what ever method you like or > adding in where the "??" are if you come up with more ideas or variations. > I can compile them into one email this weekend and send it out if that > works for everyone. > > > > Members Children reinstatement options > > > 1. Up age 26, 5 years after becoming eligible. > 2. Up to age 30 > 3. Leave as is with no limit > 4. ?? > > > Spouse/ Sig Others options: > > > 1. Deceased partner: > - Should immediately replace a deceased member, if they want it. > No change in bylaws? > 2. Split partners: > - Primary partner continues > - Secondary partner goes to the top of the reinstatement wait list, > - Above any past members waiting on the list > - Below any partner split already on the list > - Add a check box on the application to indicate primary partner? > > - No change to by-law that states a partner is a couple who joins > at the same time? > - Does not apply if the current couple becomes a couple after one > of them has joined > - Though what if they are both members, separately, then become > a couple? > 3. ?? > > Time limit for reinstatement options: > > > 1. up to 10 years, no sponsors, over 10 years with new sponsors > 2. No limit as it is currently > 3. ?? > > Limit annual reinstatement options: > > 1. One per year > 2. Two per year > 3. Three per year > 4. No limit as it is now > 5. ?? > > > Sent from Outlook > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: