From dan at dangingras.net  Sat Feb 13 07:33:03 2016
From: dan at dangingras.net (Dan Gingras)
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 09:33:03 -0500
Subject: [Board] Article 14
Message-ID: <014701d1666b$72b826a0$582873e0$@dangingras.net>

I just got off the phone with Joe Nadeau discussing article 14 and the One
Sky situation.  He feels that this article prevents a member from using the
club for commercial gain, and does not affect the board's ability to allow
the use of the club for a private function, thus the use of the club by One
Sky is totally permissible.

 

He did however suggest that we draw up a set of rules for this board (and
not necessarily future boards) outlining what type of activities are
permissible (I.e.  we allow non-profits but not political organizations).
He would be happy to review those board rules and I said I would be happy to
draft a set for review unless someone else wants to do it.   

 

If you  have any ideas as to what should be included in these board rules
for use of the club, please let me know.


Dan

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://portsmouthyc.org/pipermail/board_portsmouthyc.org/attachments/20160213/9f991dc2/attachment.htm>

From blidberg at ausi.org  Sat Feb 13 07:43:36 2016
From: blidberg at ausi.org (Dick Blidberg)
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 09:43:36 -0500
Subject: [Board] Article 14
In-Reply-To: <014701d1666b$72b826a0$582873e0$@dangingras.net>
References: <014701d1666b$72b826a0$582873e0$@dangingras.net>
Message-ID: <56BF4118.4080702@ausi.org>

I like it.  Works for me.  We can invite One Sky and work on the rules 
later.  Nice resolution!
Dick

On 2/13/2016 9:33 AM, Dan Gingras wrote:
>
> I just got off the phone with Joe Nadeau discussing article 14 and the 
> One Sky situation.  He feels that this article prevents a member from 
> using the club for commercial gain, and does not affect the board’s 
> ability to allow the use of the club for a private function, thus the 
> use of the club by One Sky is totally permissible.
>
> He did however suggest that we draw up a set of rules for this board 
> (and not necessarily future boards) outlining what type of activities 
> are permissible (I.e.  we allow non-profits but not political 
> organizations).    He would be happy to review those board rules and I 
> said I would be happy to draft a set for review unless someone else 
> wants to do it.
>
> If you  have any ideas as to what should be included in these board 
> rules for use of the club, please let me know.
>
>
> Dan
>



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://portsmouthyc.org/pipermail/board_portsmouthyc.org/attachments/20160213/226da7f9/attachment.htm>

From wendyclement10 at comcast.net  Sat Feb 13 09:51:30 2016
From: wendyclement10 at comcast.net (Wendy)
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 11:51:30 -0500
Subject: [Board] Article 14
In-Reply-To: <014701d1666b$72b826a0$582873e0$@dangingras.net>
References: <014701d1666b$72b826a0$582873e0$@dangingras.net>
Message-ID: <BF2EAA4D-F574-45CF-B157-E9E078531400@comcast.net>

This is great news!

I feel we are allowing them to use the club due to our use of their meeting room and it is a reciprocal in kind.
I'm not sure we would be doing more of this with other groups but if it is necessary to draw up guidelines then so be it.

Thank you Dan for talking with Joe.

Wendy Clement
Sent from my iPhone 


> On Feb 13, 2016, at 9:33 AM, Dan Gingras <dan at dangingras.net> wrote:
> 
> I just got off the phone with Joe Nadeau discussing article 14 and the One Sky situation.  He feels that this article prevents a member from using the club for commercial gain, and does not affect the board’s ability to allow the use of the club for a private function, thus the use of the club by One Sky is totally permissible.
>  
> He did however suggest that we draw up a set of rules for this board (and not necessarily future boards) outlining what type of activities are permissible (I.e.  we allow non-profits but not political organizations).    He would be happy to review those board rules and I said I would be happy to draft a set for review unless someone else wants to do it.  
>  
> If you  have any ideas as to what should be included in these board rules for use of the club, please let me know.
> 
> 
> Dan
>  
>  
>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://portsmouthyc.org/pipermail/board_portsmouthyc.org/attachments/20160213/6324ac46/attachment.htm>

From jamcadams at comcast.net  Sat Feb 13 10:45:40 2016
From: jamcadams at comcast.net (Jim McAdams)
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:45:40 -0400
Subject: [Board] Article 14
In-Reply-To: <014701d1666b$72b826a0$582873e0$@dangingras.net>
References: <014701d1666b$72b826a0$582873e0$@dangingras.net>
Message-ID: <EC64F0FF-5A8D-4B19-B8D3-6CB2E52CE477@comcast.net>

Good news, thank you. 

Jim


> On Feb 13, 2016, at 10:33, Dan Gingras <dan at dangingras.net> wrote:
> 
> I just got off the phone with Joe Nadeau discussing article 14 and the One Sky situation.  He feels that this article prevents a member from using the club for commercial gain, and does not affect the board’s ability to allow the use of the club for a private function, thus the use of the club by One Sky is totally permissible.
>  
> He did however suggest that we draw up a set of rules for this board (and not necessarily future boards) outlining what type of activities are permissible (I.e.  we allow non-profits but not political organizations).    He would be happy to review those board rules and I said I would be happy to draft a set for review unless someone else wants to do it.  
>  
> If you  have any ideas as to what should be included in these board rules for use of the club, please let me know.
> 
> 
> Dan
>  
>  
>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://portsmouthyc.org/pipermail/board_portsmouthyc.org/attachments/20160213/e4e61456/attachment.htm>